Unchecked AcpiEvaluateObject return in acpi_panasonic_sinf causes NULL-deref panic and heap OOB read
Summary
acpi_panasonic_sinf calls AcpiEvaluateObject for SINF never checks ACPI_STATUS return. On failure buf.Pointer NULL res->Type(:279) guaranteed NULL-deref panic. Even on success if package < index+1 elements line :280 reads past heap Elements array no Package.Count check. Reachable by any unpriv local user via 4 CTLFLAG_ANYBODY sysctl nodes hw.acpi.panasonic.*lcd_brightness _max _min sound_mute. Canonical pattern in acpi.c:2902-2908 checks ACPI_FAILURE res==NULL ACPI_PKG_VALID. Panasonic driver does none.
Discussion (0)
PoC verification
Evidence pack
findings/poc/DF-2589 Β· 5 files| File | Type | Description | Size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VERDICT.md | verdict | analysis: code bug confirmed, gate confirmed, fix authored | 1.6 KB | β raw |
| fix.diff | suggested-fix | git-apply-able defense-in-depth fix (verified --check clean) | 677 B | view raw |
| env.txt | environment | guest gate-proof: usbconfig/pciconf/ifconfig/devinfo/sysctl output | 2.0 KB | view raw |
| build.sh | build-script | no-op (no live-device PoC) | 255 B | view raw |
| run.sh | run-script | gate check (required device is absent) | 333 B | view raw |
DF-2589 β PoC verdict
File: sys/dev/acpica/acpi_panasonic/acpi_panasonic.c
Verdict: NOT REPRODUCED on this QEMU guest β confirmed HW/ACPI/device-gated; the code bug is REAL and a defense-in-depth fix.diff is attached.
Mechanism (confirmed in source)
acpi_panasonic_sinf() calls AcpiEvaluateObject("SINF") without checking the ACPI_STATUS return; on failure buf.Pointer is NULL and res->Type (line 279) is a guaranteed NULL-deref panic. Even on success, line 280 reads res->Package.Elements[index] with no Package.Count check (OOB heap read if the package has fewer than index+1 elements). Reachable via four CTLFLAG_ANYBODY sysctl nodes.
Cited lines
Why it does not reproduce on this guest
No Panasonic ACPI SINF device on the QEMU/BOCHS guest (sysctl hw.acpi.panasonic -> unknown oid; module not loaded).
Guest gate-proof (full usbconfig/pciconf/ifconfig/devinfo/sysctl/kldstat output) is in env.txt.
Defense-in-depth fix
Check ACPI_FAILURE(status) and return early; validate res!=NULL, res->Type==ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE, and index
The git-apply-able diff is in fix.diff (verified git apply --check clean).
Classification
status: not_reproducedreproduced: 0impact: none (not reachable on this guest; latent code bug confirmed in source)confidence: certain (code bug + gate both confirmed by direct source trace and guest enumeration)fix_status: not_testable (patch applies + compiles-correct by inspection, but no live device to exercise on this guest)
Fix verification
not_testablenot_testable: target device absent on this guest. fix.diff applies clean and is source-correct; no live device to exercise.
git apply --check findings/poc/DF-2589/fix.diff -> OK. No runtime test possible (HW/ACPI/device-gated).
Confirmed kernel references
Detail
Exploit chain
none β valid hard blocker (driver/device path dead at runtime on this guest: no target HW/ACPI/device). No unprivileged->root path.
Evidence (decisive lines)
usbconfig list -> No device match; pciconf -l -> no target HW/capability; ifconfig -> vtnet0 lo0; kldstat -> kernel/ehci/xhci only; sysctl/devinfo -> no target OIDs. Source confirmed at cited lines.
PoC changes
Created findings/poc/DF-2589/{VERDICT.md,fix.diff,manifest.json,env.txt,build.sh,run.sh}. No PoC source (HW/ACPI/device-gated).
Verified recommended fix
Defense-in-depth fix.diff closes the cited path (see findings/poc/DF-2589/fix.diff; git apply --check OK).
Verdict
NOT REPRODUCED (HW/ACPI/device-gated on this guest). The bug is REAL in source (traced line-by-line): acpi_panasonic unchecked AcpiEvaluateObject return (Panasonic ACPI only). Gate confirmed via usbconfig list (no devices), pciconf -l (no target HW/capability), ifconfig (vtnet0 lo0 only), kldstat (no target module), sysctl/devinfo (no target ACPI/device OIDs). The benign QEMU environment cannot produce the malicious device/ACPI/descriptor the bug requires.
No comments yet.